An annual survey by the CDC found that women who read carefully the nutrition label on food packages were on average 1.49 points lower than women who did not care about the nutritional value of the daily diet. The survey aims to reduce obesity by 40% in the next 20 years. This figure is averaged again, which is about 8 pounds. At the same time, however, this phenomenon is not as pronounced in males. Men who read the nutrition label carefully are only 0.21 points lower than unread BMIs.
However, this difference is not only reflected in gender: 49% of urban women said they would read the nutrition label, and the proportion of children who read the nutrition label nationwide is 74% (58% of men). The above phenomenon was particularly significant among white women. The overall BMI difference between women with and without reading labels was 1.76 points.
These findings are actually quite a bit of the "first chicken or egg first" problem. In the study, they did not take genetic factors into consideration, or did women who carefully read the nutrition label lose weight or stay fit? It is plausible that such people pay more attention to dietary nutrition and calories. Not only that, but the rice news media reported only last month that in a census the relevant authorities found that the numerical error on the label of such nutrients was as high as 20%, which also indicated the heat, vitamins and other nutrients on the label. The data may not be true.
But even so, reading these labels is not a hindrance. It does not mean that we can lose a few pounds of meat. It just knows what nutritious substances in the food we eat can be absorbed and beneficial. This has never been a bad thing.